Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Mariusz Klin, et al v. Cloudera, Inc., et al
as 22-16807
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CLOUDERA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIUSZ J. KLIN, Lead Plaintiff, THE MARIUSZ J. KLIN MD PA 401K PROFIT SHARING PLAN, ROBERT BOGUSLAWSKI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CLOUDERA, INC., THOMAS J. REILLY, JIM FRANKOLA and others
John Thymes, et al v. Steven Chang, et al
as 20-55650
Defendant / Appellee:
LINGCHONG CHEN, an individual, HOULING CHEN, an individual, LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN P. CHANG, in its corporate capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUEVINA HENRY and JOHN A. THYMES
John A. Thymes et al v. Steven P. Chang et al
as 5:2020cv00261
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Law Offices of Steven P. Chang, Houling Chen and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Thymes and Luevina Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fu v. Reilly et al
as 5:2019cv05705
Defendant:
Thomas J. Reilly, Robert Bearden, Ping Li and others
Plaintiff:
Jun Fu
Chen v. Reilly et al
as 3:2019cv05536
Defendant:
Thomas J. Reilly, Robert Bearden, Michael A. Olson and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chen
Luevina Henry v. Meredith A. Jury et al
as 5:2018cv00983
Defendant:
Tara Abrams, Deputy Sheriff Angeles, Honorable Christoph B. and others
Plaintiff:
Luevina Henry
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv07468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Goldstein v. Vasudevan et al
as 5:2016cv02238
Plaintiff:
Arthur Goldstein
Defendant:
Suresh Vasudevan, Anup V. Singh, Frank Calderoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schwartz v. Vasudevan et al
as 5:2016cv00892
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Schwartz
Defendant:
Suresh Vasudevan, Varun Mehta, Frank Calderoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
