Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dirk T. Griffin et al v. Mark W. Strauss et al
as 2:2022cv06183
Plaintiff:
Dirk T. Griffin, Pinner Construction Co., Inc., Mechanical Technology Systems, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mark W. Strauss, DACM Project Management, Inc., Arcadis U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. Pinner Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01037
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation
Defendant:
Does and Pinner Construction Co., Inc.
Berkley Regional Insurance Company v. Pinner Construction Co., Inc.
as 8:2014cv00806
Plaintiff:
Berkley Regional Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pinner Construction Co., Inc.
LHA Group, Inc. v. Y'Deen/Associates Architects, et al
as 14-55043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LHA GROUP, INC., A California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Y'DEEN/ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS and GARDEN GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant:
GHATAODE BANNON ARCHITECTS, PSWC GROUP, HMC ARCHITECTS and others
LHA Group Inc v. Y'Deen/Associates Architects et al
as 8:2013cv01830
Defendant:
Garden Grove Unified School District, Ghataode Bannon Architects, HMC Architects and others
Plaintiff:
LHA Group Inc
Pinner Construction Co Inc v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv01321
Defendant:
Does and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Pinner Construction Co Inc
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Pinner Construction Co Inc
as 8:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Pinner Construction Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
