Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Valles et al v. Bayou Place L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv01725
Defendant:
Gilbane Reconstruction Services, LLC, Gilbane Development Company, Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Lillian Bailey, J.B. (Minor) and Undrea Bailey
Plaintiff:
Norberto Valles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Piper v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00810
Plaintiff:
Robert S Piper
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bala v. Piper et al
as 5:2014cv00688
Plaintiff:
Rajaram Bala
Defendant:
Margaret Piper, Thomas E Wood and Wood Farms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
OGS International Aircraft Services, LLC et al v.Piper Aircraft et al
as 7:2011cv00272
Plaintiff:
OGS International Aircraft Services, LLC , Construcciones Y Arrendamientos Industriales, S.A. De C.V. and Jorge Luna Valdez
Defendant:
Piper Aircraft, Inc. , Servicios Aereos Bro Ra, S.A. De C.V., Cutter Aviation San Antonio, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrotsky et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02645
Plaintiff:
Melvin Abrotsky, Steven Nels Aslin, William Paul Barnett and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Piper v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv04395
Plaintiff:
Clinton E. Piper
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Little et al v. Piper Aircraft Company et al
as 4:2007cv00016
Plaintiff:
Virginia Little, Robert Little and Kimberly Little
Defendant:
Piper Aircraft Company, Teledyne Technologies, Inc., and Kelly Aerospace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
