Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Khademi v. Placer County Sheriff
as 24-1738
Petitioner:
DAVOOD KHADEMI
Respondent:
PLACER COUNTY SHERIFF
Willsim Latham, LLC v. Metrolist Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Willsim Latham, LLC
Defendant:
Metrolist Services, Inc., Sacramento Association of Realtors, Inc., Placer County Association of Realtors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Alameda County et al
as 3:2022cv06446
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Imperial County and others
James Cupp, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 21-16809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD CUPP and LAWRENCE HAVEN
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, XAVIER BECERRA and ROB BONTA
Defendant:
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, CHRISTOPHER W. BOYD, CHRISTIAN BAERRESEN and others
Davood Khademi v. USDC-SAC
as 21-71183
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVOOD KHADEMI and PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Petitioner:
DAVOOD KHADEMI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Davood Khademi v. Placer County Superior Court
as 21-16141
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVOOD KHADEMI
Respondent / Appellee:
PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
James Dahlin, et al v. Rosemary Frieborn, et al
as 20-16083
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD J. FRITZ, SHERRY COUZENS, CITY OF AUBURN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DAHLIN, KIMBERLY DAHLIN, MARTINA TIPPETS and others
David Cramer v. Superior Court of California
as 16-73832
:
In re: DAVID CRAMER
Petitioner:
DAVID CRAMER
Respondent:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, PLACER COUNTY
Real Party In Interest:
JULIE BELAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv03335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
