Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MARINOS et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02828
Plaintiff:
MARINOS MARINOS, NICOLE M. ARNONE, MARCUS E. ADAM and others
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BOLAND et al v. JD APPLICATORS, INC.
as 1:2012cv00461
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND , HENRY KRAMER , KEN LAMBERT and others
Defendant:
JD APPLICATORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
BOLAND et al v. LUCIA CONSTRUCTORS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND , HENRY KRAMER , KEN LAMBERT and others
Defendant:
LUCIA CONSTRUCTORS, INC. , LUCIA CONSTRUCTORS, LLC and LINBECK GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
UNITED PILOTS FOR JUSTICE, INC. et al v. UNITED AIRLINES CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv02324
Plaintiff:
UNITED PILOTS FOR JUSTICE, INC. , MIKE KELLY , STEVE CHILES and others
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES CORPORATION, UNITED LOYALTY SERVICES, LLC, GLENN F. TILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
ABATE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2008cv01265
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. ABATE, EVERETT T. ABBOTT, STEVE E. ALLEN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FLYNN et al v. NORRIS & SON, INC.
as 1:2007cv02076
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLYNN, JAMES BOLAND, GERALD O'MALLEY and others
Defendant:
NORRIS & SON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
FLYNN et al v. SHARP CONCRETE CORP.
as 1:2007cv01991
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLYNN, JAMES BOLAND, GERALD O'MALLEY and others
Defendant:
SHARP CONCRETE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
FLYNN et al v. BRICKMEN STRUCTURES, INC.
as 1:2007cv01623
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLYNN, JAMES BOLAND, GERALD O'MALLEY and others
Defendant:
BRICKMEN STRUCTURES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
