Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Poma v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv01598
Plaintiff:
Nicole Poma
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Poma v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv00931
Plaintiff:
Nicole Poma
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
6600 Suemac Place, LLC v. POMA Glass and Specialty Windows, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01417
Plaintiff:
6600 Suemac Place, LLC
Defendant:
POMA Glass and Specialty Windows, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Florida Acquisitions 1986, LLC v. POMA Glass and Specialty Windows, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01191
Plaintiff:
Florida Acquisitions 1986, LLC
Defendant:
POMA Glass and Specialty Windows, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aldora Aluminum & Glass Products, Inc. v. Poma Glass & Specialty Windows, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01402
Plaintiff:
Aldora Aluminum & Glass Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Poma Glass & Specialty Windows, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leitner-Poma of America, Inc. v. Greater Orlando Aviation Authority
as 6:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Leitner-Poma of America, Inc.
Defendant:
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Fung v. Poma et al
as 6:2012cv01527
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fung
Defendant:
Rosario Poma, 2305 Edgewater Drive, LLC, Key W. Kool, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kerr v. Powerplay Arcade, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv01441
Plaintiff:
Lance Kerr
Defendant:
Powerplay Arcade, Inc. and Ciro Poma
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Access for Disabled, et al v. Poma
as 6:2001cv00653
Plaintiff:
Access for the Disabled, Inc. and Robert Cohen
Defendant:
Khan Nur Uliah, Khan Razia and Rosario Poma
Not Classified By Court:
Ted B. Edwards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
