Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Hunter v. EPA, et al
as 19-5055
Not Yet Classified:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE CHAMBER OF OKLAHOMA, TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKEY JAMES, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL MIKE HUNTER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma
Chamber of Commerce, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-5038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-9552
Petitioner:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, STATE CHAMBER OF OKLAHOMA, TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 4:2015cv00386
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America , National Federation of Independent Business , State Chamber of Oklahoma and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , Gina McCarthy , United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
