Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. State of Utah, et al.
as 25-6196
Plaintiff:
PROTECT THE WOLVES, ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION, KETTLE RANGE CONSERVATION GROUP and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PAUL SOUZA and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. State of Montana, et al.
as 25-6212
Plaintiff:
PROTECT THE WOLVES, ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION, KETTLE RANGE CONSERVATION GROUP and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PAUL SOUZA and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service, et al.
as 25-6193
Plaintiff:
PROTECT THE WOLVES, ANIMAL WELLNESS ACTION, KETTLE RANGE CONSERVATION GROUP and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PAUL SOUZA, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servic and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, et al.
as 25-5109
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS, HUMANE WORLD ACTION FUND and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, PAUL SOUZA, in his official capacity as Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor:
SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, STATE OF UTAH, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and others
Western Watersheds Project et al v. Williams et al
as 9:2024cv00087
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Deb Haaland, United States Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff:
Protect the Wolves, Wilderness Watch, Trap Free Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 9:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, The Kettle Range Conservation Group, Nimiipuu Protecting the Environment and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Interior, Martha Williams, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor:
Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, Safari Club International and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Amicus Curiae:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Western Watersheds Project et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 9:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project, International Wildlife Coexistence Network, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant:
Martha Williams, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Deb Haaland and others
Intervenor:
Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, Safari Club International and Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Western Watersheds Project, et al. v. USDA APHIS, et al.
as 1:2020cv00213
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, US Forest Service, USDA APHIS and others
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project, WildEarth Guardians and Predator Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Cascadia Wildlands, et al v. USDA, et al
as 17-35508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CASCADIA WILDLANDS, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department, ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE-WILDLIFE SERVICES, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and DAVID WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Oregon State Director for USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services
Western Watersheds Project et al v. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services
as 1:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
Western Watersheds Project , WildEarth Guardians , Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
USDA APHIS Wildlife Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
