Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Minor v. Central Forest Products Inc et al
as 3:2019cv01631
Defendant:
Central Forest Products Inc and Travis Brown
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Minor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manning v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv00976
Plaintiff:
Michelle Manning
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Avon Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hinton v. United States Pipe Foundry Company et al
as 2:2012cv04109
Plaintiff:
Steven Hinton
Defendant:
United States Pipe Foundry Company , Mueller Water Products, Inc. and Mueller Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Swanger v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 7:2011cv01429
Plaintiff:
Charles Swanger
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America , Tamko Building Products, Inc. and Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Tamko Building Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Vinyl-Mark Products, Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01620
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor and Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Vinyl-Mark Products, Inc, Willard D Bailey, Jr., Jessie Mae Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Harrell v. Quality Outdoor Products, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01120
Plaintiff:
Shablis Harrell
Defendant:
Quality Outdoor Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mercer v. Astralloy Steel Products, Inc
as 2:2008cv01312
Plaintiff:
Gary C Mercer and Gary C Mercer
Defendant:
Astralloy Steel Products, Inc and Astralloy Steel Products, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Odum v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The et al
as 7:2007cv01729
Plaintiff:
Tommy Odum
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The and Tamko Roofing Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
