Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Cindy Ochoa v. Service Employees Internationa, et al
as 19-35870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINDY ELLEN OCHOA, as an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Washington, CHERYL STRANGE, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 775, an unincorporated labor association and others
Cindy Ochoa v. Service Employees Internationa, et al
as 19-35653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINDY ELLEN OCHOA, as an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Washington, CHERYL STRANGE, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Social and Health Services, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 775, an unincorporated labor association and others
Public Consulting Group, Inc. v. EL Education, Inc.
as 1:2016mc00241
Plaintiff:
Public Consulting Group, Inc.
Defendant:
EL Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
USA, et al v. Caremark, Inc, et al
as 5:2012cv00929
Neutral:
Karl Bayer and Paul Stickney
Special Master:
Karl Bayer
Intervenor Defendant:
Caremark Inc. and Caremark RX, Inc.
Defendant:
Caremark International Holdings, Inc., Caremark International, Inc., Caremark RX, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, Janaki Ramados, State of Delaware and others
Movant:
Health Care of Delaware, Inc., HealthAssurance of Pennsylvania, McKesson Corporation and others
Notice Only Party:
KPMG LLP, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Public Consulting Group, Inc. and others
919)571-4837 (fax:
State of North Carolina
Intervenor Plaintiff:
The State of California, United States Of America, the State of Arkansas and others
Unknown:
Nicholas Bagley, Meredith Lynn Burrell and Jeanette L. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
