Cases 21 - 30 of 218
Hawshon Riley, et al v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc., et al
as 21-55909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAWSHON RILEY and DAGNY RILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., as trustee for LSF9 Master Participation TrustU.S. Bank Trust, N.A. as trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust and QUALITY LOANS SERVICE CORPORATION
Defendant:
MILLENNIUM MORTGAGE CORP., BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP and others
Leslie Jensen-Edwards v. US Bank, N.A., et al
as 21-35557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESLIE JENSEN-EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
US BANK, N.A., not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee for NRZ Pass-Through Trust VIII, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., MERS, as nominee for Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank, its successors and assigns and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, DBA Mr. Cooper
Defendant:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION and ROBERT W. MCDONALD
Richard Clark v. LSF9 Master Participation Trus, et al
as 20-36058
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust, QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON and LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD W. CLARK, as trustee of Richard W. Clark and Merri Sue Clark Revocable Living Trust
John Wilson, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 20-36011
Defendant / Appellee:
MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, a California partnership, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a Florida Corporation and subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co., a Delaware corporation and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, a Washington corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACQUELINE M. WILSON, a married woman and JOHN R. WILSON, a married man
Chul Gong v. Westlend Financing, Inc., et al
as 20-56082
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1 through 25, Inclusive, KRISTIE AHN, Co-Owner and Lender for Westlend Financing, Inc., Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Secretary for Westlend Financing, Inc., Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Agent for Services for Westlend Financing, Inc., filed Statment of Informa, DANNY AHN, Owner of Westlend Financing, Inc. Corporate Article Number C1782341 Filed April 18, 1996 with S.O.S. and Refiled Statement of Information with S.O.S., E-J08893, January 10, 2012 and Agent for Services for Westlend Financing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHUL HYUN GONG
Chul Gong v. Westlend Financing, Inc., et al
as 20-55881
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1 through 25, Inclusive, KRISTIE AHN, Co-Owner and Lender for Westlend Financing, Inc., Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Secretary for Westlend Financing, Inc., Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Agent for Services for Westlend Financing, Inc., filed Statment of Informa, DANNY AHN, Owner of Westlend Financing, Inc. Corporate Article Number C1782341 Filed April 18, 1996 with S.O.S. and Refiled Statement of Information with S.O.S., E-J08893, January 10, 2012 and Agent for Services for Westlend Financing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHUL HYUN GONG
Shawn Gordon v. U.S. Bank, N.A., et al
as 20-55850
Defendant / Appellee:
FAY SERVICING, LLC and U.S. BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN GORDON
Debbie Thompson v. U.S. Bank, N.A., et al
as 20-16376
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBBIE ALICE THOMPSON
Mirek Boruta, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 20-15524
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIREK BORUTA and MARIA BORUTA
Defendant / Appellee:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Ruby Aftab, et al v. Quality Loan Service Corporati, et al
as 20-35180
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1 through 5, QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBY AFTAB and ZAFAR HAQ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
