Cases 41 - 50 of 16,062
MATTISON v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60116
Plaintiff:
HAROLD MATTISON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SNOW v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60090
Plaintiff:
MEREDITH SNOW
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERRETTI v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60067
Plaintiff:
PASCHAL FERRETTI
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOCKMAN v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60099
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LOCKMAN
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAVIX v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60070
Plaintiff:
PAUL LAVIX
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRUZS v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60055
Plaintiff:
JOHN GRUZS
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COPELAND v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60110
Plaintiff:
HENRY COPELAND
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANDRIDGE v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60111
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. DANDRIDGE
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANNING v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60115
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MANNING
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARNER v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60140
Plaintiff:
WILMER T. GARNER
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
