Cases 51 - 60 of 16,062
BROWN v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60124
Plaintiff:
LEROY BROWN
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHIELDS v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60103
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCHIELDS
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLURE v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60058
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MCCLURE
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOLBA v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60091
Plaintiff:
JOHN STOLBA
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60102
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PATTERSON
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROADWAY v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60079
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT BROADWAY
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKS v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60114
Plaintiff:
FLOYD M. HICKS, JR.
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REED v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60088
Plaintiff:
ELLIS REED
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLIS v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60056
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOLLIS
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERORAZIO v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60060
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PIERORAZIO
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
