Cases 1 - 10 of 83
In Re EzriNamvar
as 2:2017cv07759
Appellant:
126 Valencia LLC, Shahram Elyaszadeh and Yona Semih
In Re Debtor:
Ezri Namvar
Appellee:
R. Todd Neilson
R Todd Neilson v Synergy Holdings LLC, et al
as 2:2015cv08658
Defendant:
Does and Synergy Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
R. Todd Neilson,
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-56690
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: William E. Preston
as 14-56660
Debtor:
In the Matter of: WILLIAM EVERETT PRESTON
Plaintiff - Appellee:
R. TODD NEILSON, Chapter 7 Trustee
Defendant:
JOYCE MOORE, THE PRESTON MUSIC GROUP, INC. and FREDRICK WILHELMS, III
Defendant - Appellant:
THE WILLIAM PRESTON TRUST
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05743
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thelma Spirtos v. R. Neilson, et al
as 14-80102
Debtor - Petitioner:
THELMA V. SPIRTOS
Trustee - Respondent:
R. TODD NEILSON and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
In re: GGW Brands, LLC
as 14-55381
Debtor:
In the Matter of: GGW BRANDS, LLC
Appellant:
PATH MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC
Appellee:
R. TODD NEILSON, solely in his capacity as chapter 11 trustee of GGW Brands, LLC, GGW DIRECT, LLC, GGW EVENTS, LLC and others
Path Media Holdings, LLC v. USDC-CALA
as 14-70589
:
In re: PATH MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC
Petitioner:
PATH MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
GGW BRANDS, LLC, GGW MARKETING, LLC, GGW DIRECT, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00163
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
