Cases 31 - 37 of 37
R. Alexander Acosta v. Wilmington Trust N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv06325
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor, U.S. Dept. of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
The HCMC Legal Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Wilmington Trust N.A.
Interested Party:
HCMC Legal, Inc., Lynn Mestel, Daroth Capital Advisors LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Secretary of Labor, U.S. Dept. of Labor v. Hyperion Medical P.C. et al
as 1:2017cv05590
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Hyperion Medical P.C., Achilles Medical P.C. and Geoffrey Richstone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Paul Dill Associates Inc., d/b/a Bi County Auto Body et al
as 2:2017cv04324
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Paul Dill Associates Inc., Paul Dill, Jr. and Paul Dill, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta v. Mucino, et al
as 1:2017cv00605
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Agave Elmwood Inc. , Don Tequila Dos, Inc. , Don Tequila, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Don Tequila, Inc. , Don Tequila Dos, Inc. , Agave Elmwood Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Jose Manuel Sanchez-Ocampo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Neurological Care P.C. et al
as 1:2017cv03931
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Michael Amoashiy, Sofia Amoashiy and Neurological Care P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta v. Wuest & DiFara & Associates Profit Sharing Plan
as 8:2017cv00572
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Wuest & DiFara & Associates Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Liberty Gas Station and Convenience Store, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00561
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Liberty Gas Station and Convenience Store, LLC, Liberty Pizza & Convenience, Inc. and Huseyin Turan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
