Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
R. Alexander Acosta v. Global One Logistics Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00418
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant: Yariv Vertheim, Global One Logistics Inc and Arik Vertheim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Padilla Construction Company et al v. R. Alexander Acosta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01214
Defendant: R. Alexander Acosta, Rosemary Lahaskey and William Thompson
Plaintiff: BMC West LLC, Padilla Construction Company and TruCo Services, Inc.
R. Alexander Acosta v. Information Networking Company, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2018cv00098
Defendant: INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPANY SIMPLE IRA, John Benjamin Riddle and INFORMATION NETWORKING COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
R. Alexander Acosta v. SSC Apparel, Inc.
as 2:2017cv09185
Petitioner: R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent: SSC Apparel, Inc.
R. Alexander Acosta v. SSC Apparel, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017mc00153
Petitioner: R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent: SSC Apparel, Inc.
R. Alexander Acosta v. American Postal Workers Union APWU Local 4635 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017mc00016
Petitioner: R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent: American Postal Workers Union APWU Local 4635
R. Alexander Acosta et al v. Authentic Brothers Towing, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv00922
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta and Judith Vasquez
Defendant: Authentic Brothers Towing, Inc. and Francisco Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00959
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?