Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rice et al v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00936
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc. , Accord Healthcare, Ltd. , Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Rice , Robert Rice , Antoinette Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. IDOC
as 1:2015cv01136
Petitioner:
Andrew R Clark
Respondent:
IDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Bailey et al
as 1:2015cv01133
Plaintiff:
Andrew R Clark, III
Defendant:
C/O Bailey, R Adams, Greg Gossett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 1:2014cv01009
Plaintiff:
Andrew R Clark, III
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Basterash et al v. MedX, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07814
Plaintiff:
Scott Basterash and Carl R. Clark
Defendant:
MedX, Inc., MedX, LLC, Sean McDermott and others
Respondent:
Anthony M. Sciara
Petitioner:
Larry D. Gasper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Hansen et al
as 1:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Williams
Defendant:
Sharon Hansen, Michelle R Clark, Robert Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v Pfister, et al
as 1:2013cv01076
Plaintiff:
Reginald Smith
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Marvin Reed, Mark Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Shadid et al
as 1:2013cv01053
Plaintiff:
Reginald Smith
Defendant:
James E. Shadid, Joe Billy McDade, Michael Mihm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz vs. Big Muddy et al
as 3:2012cv01168
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz
Defendant:
C/O Childers, K Finny, R Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Diaz vs. Big Muddy et al
as 1:2012cv01464
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz
Defendant:
. Childers, K Finny, R Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
