Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Biton v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv02394
Defendant:
275 Cono Association Management, A.T.F., AFA Flight Attendants Union and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Biton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalez Nunez et al v. R. Gross Dairy Kosher Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00861
Plaintiff:
Nestor Gonzalez Nunez , Nestor Gonzales Nunez , Nestor Sanchez and others
Defendant:
R. Gross Dairy Kosher Restaurant Inc. , Yuval Zarai and Moti Zilber
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bitton v. Chitrid
as 13-1168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Danielle Bitton, AKA Marcelle Bitton, AKA Marcelle Fhima, AKA Crystal Biton, AKA Saphyre Redford, AKA Kristy Alexis Tigress Redford, AKA Charlene Michelle Biton, AKA Michelle Bitton, AKA Danielle Biton, AKA Jacob Biton, AKA Jacob Bitton, AKA Joseph Bitton
Defendant - Appellee:
Simon Chitrid, President Obama, Mayor of Chicago and others
Biton v. Aventura
as 13-1167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Danielle Biton, AKA Bitton, AKA Marcelle Bitton, AKA Charlene Biton, AKA Kristy Alexis, AKA Tigress Redford, AKA Crystal & Saphyre
Defendant - Appellee:
Aventura, a municipal Corporation, Florida Mayor Gottlieb, Marymount Manhattan College and others
Bitton v. Chitrid et al
as 1:2012cv05359
Plaintiff:
Danielle Bitton, Marcelle Bitton, Marcelle Fhima and others
Defendant:
Simon Chitrid, President Obama, Mayor of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Biton v. Aventura et al
as 1:2012cv05426
Defendant:
ACLU, Aaronson Rapport Feinstein Deutch, Ann Friedfertig and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasquez et al v. R Gross Dairy Kosher Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv07077
Plaintiff:
Santiago Vasquez , Pablo Ramirez , Jony Celis and others
Defendant:
R Gross Dairy Kosher Restaurant Inc., Ari Fishbaum, Moti Zilber and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
