Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Nowak v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07782
Defendant:
MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DONNA R. GROGAN, JANE BARLOW and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID NOWAK
Cespedes v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07804
Defendant:
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Donna R. Grogan, Jane Barlow and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cespedes
Booth Family Trust v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07461
Defendant:
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Donna R. Grogan, Jane Barlow and others
Plaintiff:
Booth Family Trust
Post v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01205
Defendant:
Bruce Downey, Donna Roy Grogan, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Post
Rudik v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07313
Defendant:
Bruce Downey, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Donna Roy Grogan and others
Plaintiff:
Tressa Rudik
Wang v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01175
Defendant:
Bruce Downey, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Donna Roy Grogan and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Marques v. XP Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01824
Plaintiff:
Ederson Da Silvia Marques
Defendant:
Gabriel Klas Da Rocha Leal, Guilherme Sant'Anna Da Silva, Bruno Constantino Alexandre Dos Santos and others
Petitioner:
Swayam Prakash and Usha Prakash
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Acerno v. Benchimol et al
as 1:2020cv01502
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Julio Capua Ramos da Silva and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Acerno
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
VOTTO v. WALSH et al
as 2:2019cv02888
Defendant:
BRIAN FORD, AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P., JOHN WALSH, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
PETER VOTTO
Scarantino v. AmeriGas Partners, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv01045
Defendant:
AmeriGas Propane Holdings LLC, AmeriGas Partners, L.P., UGI Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scarantino
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
