Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Raymond Hanna ElIn re: Raymond Hanna El
as 23-10164
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND ANTHONY HANNA EL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES SERVICE CORPORATION, PATRICK A. WHITE, WILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS and others
Hanna El v. United States Service Corporation et al
as 0:2022cv61629
Plaintiff:
Raymond Anthony Hanna El
Defendant:
United States Service Corporation, Patrick A. White, William P. Dimitrouleas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Raymond Hanna ElIn re: Raymond Hanna El
as 20-11959
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND ANTHONY HANNA EL
Raymond Hanna El v. State of Florida, et al
as 19-10952
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, DENNIS BAILEY, RICHARD L. SCOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ANTHONY HANNA EL
Raymond Hanna El v. State of Florida, et al
as 19-10954
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ELLEN FELD, BROWARD COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ANTHONY HANNA EL
In re: Raymond Hanna
as 18-12877
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND ANTHONY HANNA
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Raymond Hanna v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 14-12825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND ANTHONY HANNA
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, JOEL LAZARUS, SANDRA PEARLMEN and others
Hanna v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 0:2014cv61270
Plaintiff:
Raymond Anthony Hanna
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Joel Lazarus, Sandra Pearlmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Hanna v. State of Florida, et al
as 14-12270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND ANTHONY HANNA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, CARLOS S. REBOLLO, MARK SPIESER and others
Hanna v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2014cv60922
Plaintiff:
Raymond Anthony Hanna
Defendant:
State of Florida, Carlos Rebollo, Mark Spieser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
