Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MARINA DEL REY, INC. v. SUMMA LOGISTICS CORPORATION
as 3:2023cv21335
Plaintiff:
MARINA DEL REY, INC.
Defendant:
SUMMA LOGISTICS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC v. REY'S INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC
Defendant:
REY'S INC. doing business as COPA DE ORO and REYES ORTEGA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
REIS, INC. et al v. CONNECTONE BANK
as 2:2018cv10593
Plaintiff:
REIS, INC. and REIS SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
CONNECTONE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCCABE v. RIVES et al
as 2:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
CARLYN MCCABE
Defendant:
CLAY H. RIVES, TAYLOR BEAN & WHITAKER MORTGAGE CORP., POWERS KIRN, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
GARDEN STATE LAND TITLE LLC , WILLIAM M.E. POWERS, JR., ESQ. and POWERS KIRN, LLC
Cross_defendant:
GARDEN STATE LAND TITLE LLC , WILLIAM M.E. POWERS, JR., ESQ. , POWERS KIRN, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SCOTT v. DEMARCO REI, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv03822
Plaintiff:
LUCILLE SCOTT
Defendant:
DEMARCO REI, INC., GATEWAY FUNDING, LLC DIVERSIFIED MORTGAGE SERVICES, L.P., GARDEN STATE LAND TITLE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
CRISS et al v. DEMARCO REI, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv06508
Plaintiff:
BARRY CRISS and MARY LOU CRISS
Defendant:
DEMARCO REI, INC., ANTHONY DEMARCO, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
DETWEILER v. DEMARCO REI, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv06027
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T. DETWEILER
Defendant:
DEMARCO REI, INC., ANTHONY DEMARCO, SYLVESTER HUNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
RIZZO v. DEMARCO REI, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01453
Plaintiff:
JERI RIZZO
Defendant:
DEMARCO REI, INC., LORI PALKA, J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
