Cases 1 - 7 of 7
KOSUTA et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv30382
Plaintiff:
CRAIG J. KOSUTA and ELEANOR M. KOSUTA
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION, MOTION CONTROLS INDUSTRIES, ALLIED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
CONTE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68139
Plaintiff:
HENRY A CONTE and CONCETTA CONTE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC., ARMSTRONG CORK CO., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROGAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2007cv68096
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BROGAN and ANN BROGAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG CORK CO., AP GREEN REFRACTORIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOERICHT et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2007cv68124
Plaintiff:
CHARLES THOERICHT and LORRAINE THOERICHT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES INC., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCALEER v. H.K. PORTER CO., INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68143
Plaintiff:
PATRICK V MCALEER
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER CO., INC., JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
REESE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68141
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE REESE and ARTHUR REESE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC., ARMSTRONG CORK CO., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEWITT et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68178
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA HEWITT and RICHARD P. HEWITT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, A C & S, INC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
