Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Alaska Wilderness League et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Alaska Wilderness League , Center for Biological Diversity , Greenpeace, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Kenneth L. Salazar, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement and others
Movant:
Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 4332
REDOIL, et al v. EPA
as 12-70518
Petitioner:
RESISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION ON INDIGENOUS LANDS, REDOIL, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Native Village of Point Hope, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 12-70459
Petitioner:
NATIVE VILLAGE OF POINT HOPE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Respondent:
KEN SALAZAR, Secretary Of The Interior and BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT
Native Village of Point Hope, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 11-72891
Petitioner:
NATIVE VILLAGE OF POINT HOPE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Respondent:
KEN SALAZAR, Secretary Of The Interior and BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Native Village of Point Hope, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 10-70166
Petitioner:
NATIVE VILLAGE OF POINT HOPE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF ALASKA
Intervenor - Pending:
SHELL GULF OF MEXICO INC.
Respondent:
KEN SALAZAR, Secretary Of The Interior and MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE
Native Village of Point Hope, et al v. Ken Salazar, et al
as 09-73942
Petitioner:
NATIVE VILLAGE OF POINT HOPE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Respondent:
KEN SALAZAR, Secretary Of The Interior and MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE
Respondent-Intervenor:
STATE OF ALASKA and SHELL OFFSHORE INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
