Cases 11 - 20 of 27
GUNDRY v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60290
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. GUNDRY
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, C.E THURSTON AND SONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BARTELL v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2009cv60518
Plaintiff:
EARNEST G BARTELL
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WAWIORKA v. ACANDS INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60445
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN WAWIORKA
Defendant:
ACANDS NC, ACANDS NC, ANCHOR PACKING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEICKEM v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60441
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEICKEM
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RIGDON v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91233
Plaintiff:
LEO RIGDON
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BEY v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv89979
Plaintiff:
GEORGE J. BEY
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., AC&S, INC., AC&S, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCGOWEN v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90150
Plaintiff:
HAROLD MCGOWEN
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HEINE v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90168
Plaintiff:
JAMES A HEINE, SR
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MUFFLER v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv89976
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. MUFFLER, JR.
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HESTER v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90072
Plaintiff:
BILLIE J HESTER
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
