Cases 1 - 10 of 14
USA v. Michael Riley
as 23-3057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Angelo Riley
Fontaine Lavot Riley v. William Barr
as 20-1371
Petitioner:
Fontaine Lavot Riley
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
PARKS et al v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO et al
as 1:2019mc00007
Defendant:
F. DANIEL SICILIANO, GREG SEIBLY, JOHN F. LUIKART and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY L. SIMONS and LAWRENCE H. PARKS
Christopher Stoller v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 16-7140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation, William C. Erbey, Ronald Faris and others
RILEY v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01871
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. RILEY
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC., AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., DELTA AIR LINES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MCCLELLAND et al v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
as 1:2014cv01171
Plaintiff:
RILEY MCCLELLAND , PAT MCCLELLAND , STEVE GNIADEK and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RILEY v. BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv01677
Plaintiff:
JOHNETTA RILEY
Defendant:
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A., FIRST PREMIER BANK and MISSOURI BANK AND TRUST
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Angel Rivera v. Russell Wolff, et al
as 11-5202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angel Ruiz Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
Russell Wolff, Esq., Ellen Bass, Esq., U.S. Department of Education (USDE), Office of the Inspector General (OIG), Rafael Nater, Esq., USDE-OIG Chief Auditor of Puerto Rico's Office Porfirio Rios, USDE'S International Review Branch and others
In Re SUBPOENA IN UNITED STATES
as 1:2009mc00275
Respondent:
STACCARDO RILEY
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
RILEY v. IQBAL
as 1:2007cv00452
Plaintiff:
TRICIA ANNE RILEY
Defendant:
AMER IQBAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
