Cases 1 - 10 of 13
VOTE FORWARD et al v. DEJOY et al
as 1:2020cv02405
Plaintiff:
VOCES UNIDAS DE LAS MONTANAS, PADRES & JOVENES UNIDOS, VOTE FORWARD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and LOUIS DEJOY
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBERSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv03036
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANITA ROBERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERSON v. FBI
as 1:2018cv01593
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROBERSON
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RODRIGUEZ et al v. AIR FORCE et al
as 1:2018cv00744
Plaintiff:
OSCAR RODRIGUEZ, JR. and CHARLES ROBERSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, MICHAEL SOVITSKY, JOE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
SCHORR v. ROBERSON et al
as 1:2015cv01290
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. SCHORR
Defendant:
DENISE E. ROBERSON, RANDOLPH W. SAWYER, CASSANDRA A. MAXIMOUS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FLEMING v. COWARD et al
as 1:2012cv00330
Plaintiff:
LLOYD J. FLEMING
Defendant:
RICHARD COWARD , WALTER W. TWEEDY , POOL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FLEMING v. TWEEDY et al
as 1:2011cv01055
Plaintiff:
LLOYD J. FLEMING
Defendant:
WALTER W. TWEEDY, POOL, P. HEMPHILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02245
Plaintiff:
IRENE ROBERSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RASHEED v. WINSTON, et al.,
as 1:2010cv02088
Plaintiff:
AHMAD RASHEED
Defendant:
RHONDA REID WINSTON, CATHY LANIER, PAUL TOLOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
