Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jamaal Zimmerman-Little v. Ronald Oliver, et al
as 2:2026cv01950
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Zimmerman-Little
Defendant:
Ronald Oliver, NDOC, Kim McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ser v. SDCC Officer et al
as 3:2026cv00289
Plaintiff:
Georgio M. Ser
Defendant:
SDCC Officer, SDCC Officer (2), Doug and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Bean et al
as 2:2026cv01138
Plaintiff:
Henry Mason
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Barrett, Ronald Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahoud v. Williams et al
as 2:2026cv00864
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahoud
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Jeremy Bean, Julie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Dikin et al
as 2:2026cv00794
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Dikin, Nowell, Bob Fulker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sarnowski v. Johnson et al
as 3:2026cv00101
Plaintiff:
Trevor Sarnowski
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Brian William, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Oliver, et al.
as 26-476
Petitioner:
ERIC DEON ROBINSON
Respondent:
RONALD OLIVER, Substituted in Place of Gabriela Najera, WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, named as SDCC Warden Hutchings, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and others
Araya v. Arcia et al
as 2:2025cv02629
Plaintiff:
Aron Araya
Defendant:
Martin Arcia, Ronald Oliver, Portillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodlow v. Oliver, et al.
as 25-8088
Petitioner:
DELJUAN MARKE GOODLOW
Respondent:
RONALD OLIVER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Campos v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2025cv02577
Plaintiff:
Oscar Campos
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Kenneth Williams, Jeremy Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
