Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rowles v. EM Key, LLC
as 2:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Diana Rowles
Defendant:
EM Key, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
ROWLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38237
Plaintiff:
AMBER ROWLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71346
Plaintiff:
JASON BRADLEY ROWLES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv65407
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUBIN ROWLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00465
Plaintiff:
NIKKI JAMES, DEBORAH EVANS, CARLIS GEER and others
Defendant:
OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWLES et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00028
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY A ROWLES and MILTON L ROWLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowles v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 9:2018cv81158
Defendant:
Claude Maye, Jules Heller and GEO Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Rowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowles v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2017cv00375
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Rowles
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rowles v. Altavilla of Naples, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00337
Plaintiff:
Diana Rowles
Defendant:
Altavilla of Naples, LLC, Tina Palmese and Gelsomino Palmese
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
ROWLS v. USA
as 4:2015cv00286
Petitioner:
ERIC RAYONN ROWLS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
