Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, et al. v. Royal Metal Works, Inc.
as 2:2022ms00004
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, et al.
Defendant:
Royal Metal Works, Inc. and William Paul Blazvick
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Royal Metal Works, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00334
Plaintiff:
SMACNA of Southern Nevada (aka Southern Nevada Air Conditioning & Sheet Metal Contractors' Association, Inc.) Trades Program, Local 88 Industry Stabilization Program, Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Unified Construction Industry Council Fund and others
Defendant:
ROYAL METAL WORKS, INC. and William Paul Blazvick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Royal Metal Works, Inc et al
as 2:2015cv07592
Defendant:
William Paul Blazvick and Royal Metal Works, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, The Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, The Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Section 401 K Plan and others
Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Royal Metal Works Inc et al
as 2:2013cv03306
Defendant:
William Paul Blazvick, Angelo Michael Iannucci and Royal Metal Works Inc
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of Local 88 Apprentice Training and Journeyman Educational Fund, Board of Trustees of Local 88 Industry Stabilization Program, Board of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Retiree Health Plan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
