Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Robert Finamore et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2013cv00700
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Amcord, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Rebecca Finamore and Robert Finamore
Carol McIndoe et al v. Crane Co et al
as 2:2012cv09727
Defendant: American Chemet Corporation, Bath Iron Works Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Carol McIndoe, Lorraine McIndoe and Pauline McIndoe
Carol McIndoe et al v. Crane Co et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv09639
Defendant: American Chemet Corporation, Bath Iron Works Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Carol McIndoe, Lorraine McIndoe and Pauline McIndoe
Charles Tyrone Hill et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv08713
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Charles Tyrone Hill and Susan Hill
Rosalie Jean Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00811
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps, Inc: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To The Delaval Separator Company: Alfa Laval Inc
Ued As Successor-in-interest To Thursh Company And H.A. Thrush Company: Amtrol Inc
Defendant: Armstrong International Inc, CLA-VAL Co, Cameron International Corporation and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chapman Valve Company, Deming Pump Company, Jenkin: Crane Co
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company: Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Sierra Talc Company And United Talc Company: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu: FMC Corporation
Ued As Successor To Edward Valve, Inc: Flowserve US Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Henry Valve Co: Henry Technologies Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Delaval Turbine, Inc., And C.H. Wheeler Manufactur: IMO Industries
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Robertshaw Controls Company Dba Fulton Sylphon Val: Invensys Systems Inc
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson
Ued Successor-in-interest To Klipfel Valves, Inc: O C Keckley Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To International Talc Company: RT Vanderbilt Company Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries, Inc: Zurn Industries LLC
Nelson et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00793
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amtrol Inc and others
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson and Rosalie Jean Nelson
James McIndoe et al v. Asbestos Corporation Limited et al
as 2:2011cv08970
Defendant: American Chemet Corporation, Asbestos Corporation Limited, Bath Iron Works Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Carol McIndoe and James McIndoe
James McIndoe et al v. Asbestos Corporation Limited et al
as 2:2011cv08875
Defendant: American Chemet Corporation, Asbestos Corporation Limited, Bath Iron Works Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Carol McIndoe and James McIndoe
Mary T. Meredith et al v. Bondex Internatinal, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00886
Plaintiff: Mary T. Meredith, Mary T. Meredith, Mary T. Meredith and others
Defendant: Bondex Internatinal, Inc., Bondex Internatinal, Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Mary T. Meredith et al v. Bondex International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv04443
Plaintiff: Mary T Meredith, Mary T Meredith, Mary T Meredith and others
Defendant: Bondex International, Inc., CBS Corporation, Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?