Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02202
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Huizhou Shunchi Sports Co., Ltd., Jiangmen Cool-Bey Crafts Factory and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nirvana, L.L.C. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv05361
Plaintiff:
Nirvana, L.L.C.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Shenzhen Longgang District Bainatong Firm, Xiamen Qianfanhang Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Yu et al v. Diguojiaoyu, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07303
Plaintiff:
RUILI JIN and SHANCHUN YU
Defendant:
XIANYANGLIDEYUANSHANGMAO, LLC., DIGUOJIAOYU, INC. d/b/s DIGUO EDU., SHUNTAO ZHANG a/k/a KIMI ZHANG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zhejiang Ruili Cemented Carbide Co. Ltd. v. Chemung Supply Corp. et al
as 6:2014cv06540
Plaintiff:
Zhejiang Ruili Cemented Carbide Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
Chemung Supply Corp. , Attorney Recovery System Inc. , Marty Matamoros and others
Counter_claimant:
Chemung Supply Corp.
Counter_defendant:
Zhejiang Ruili Cemented Carbide Co. Ltd. and Chemung Supply Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zhejiang Ruili Cemented Carbide Co. Ltd. v. Chemung Supply Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv03633
Plaintiff:
Zhejiang Ruili Cemented Carbide Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
Chemung Supply Corp. , Attorney Recovery System Inc. , Marty Matamoros and others
Counter_claimant:
Chemung Supply Corp.
Counter_defendant:
Zhejiang Ruili Cemented Carbide Co. Ltd. and Chemung Supply Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
