Cases 11 - 20 of 235
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. 4018 W. VINE STREET, LLLP et al
as 2:2020cv13089
Defendant:
ISSA EL-HINN, CHRIS HINN and 4018 W. VINE STREET, LLLP
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. SHIVAM ESHAN, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02763
Defendant:
SHIVAM ESHAN, LLC, KAUSHIK PATEL and CHHITUBHAI PATEL
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. PATEL et al
as 2:2020cv02470
Defendant:
ANIL KUMAR PATEL and SUNITA A. PATEL
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. PATEL et al
as 2:2020cv02486
Defendant:
ANIL KUMAR PATEL and SUNITA A. PATEL
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. KNL PROPERTIES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00983
Defendant:
HYUNGCHAN KIM, KNL PROPERTIES, INC. and KYUNGHAE LEE
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. AMERICAN TRADERS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv21499
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADERS, INC. and HARINDER SINGH
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. JJ HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv20582
Defendant:
JJ HOSPITALITY, LLC and VITHAL BHANDERI
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. MS HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv19955
Defendant:
BENNY MAGNESS, THOMAS SHARP, MS HOSPITALITY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. DOABA MOTEL, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv17644
Defendant:
JAGJIT GIRN, DEVINDER GIRN and DOABA MOTEL, INC.
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. 4018 W. VINE STREET, LLLP et al
as 2:2019cv16698
Defendant:
CHRIS HINN and 4018 W. VINE STREET, LLLP
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
