Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Sivak v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
SGT. Ramirez, Aaron Fodge, R. Findeisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Alexa Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
B-3-88-A, et al. v. Sileoni 98822
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
William B-3-88-A, Linzy, Thompson and others
Defendant:
Sileoni 98822
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jimmy C Moore
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt, Alberto Ramirez, Timothy Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. Ramirez
as 1:2022cv00311
Petitioner:
James Snyder
Respondent:
Al Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sileoni v. Richerson, et al.
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Richerson, Wessels, Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Tewalt, Richerson, Wessels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Warden Richardson et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Warden Richardson, Warden Ramirez, Warden Mckay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Allen
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez and Jay Christensen
Respondent:
Liz Neville, Randall L. Valteyi and All Successors in Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodrick v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Bree Derrick, Ross Castleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
