Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stutzman et al. v. Armstrong, et al.
as 2:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Rob Stutzman and Jonathan Wheeler
Defendant:
Lance Armstrong, Penguin Group (USA), Inc., G.P. Putnam's Sons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Patrick White v. Random House Inc et al
as 2:2012cv05150
Defendant:
Dream Hampton, Jay-Z and Random House Inc
Plaintiff:
Patrick White
Joseph OBrien v. Random House Inc
as 2:2011cv05108
Plaintiff:
Joseph OBrien
Defendant:
Random House Inc
The Ray Charles Foundation v. Ray Charles Robinson Jr. et al
as 2:2010cv08799
Defendant:
DOES, Random House, Inc.,, Ray Charles Robinson, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
The Ray Charles Foundation
Donald M. Dible v. Random House, Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv03800
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Dible
Defendant:
Random House, Inc., and Dr. Nick Trout
Donald J. Dible v. Random House, Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv02149
Defendant:
Jana Christy, Julie Aigner Clark, HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Dible
Herbert Cohen v. Barney Hoskyns et al
as 2:2009cv04400
Plaintiff:
Herbert Cohen, Herbert Cohen and Herbert Cohen
Defendant:
Barney Hoskyns, Barney Hoskyns, Barney Hoskyns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Type:
Torts - Injury
Vicki Iovine v. Random House, Inc.,
as 2:2007cv07025
Plaintiff:
Vicki Iovine
Defendant:
Random House, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Porter v. Bertelsmann AG et al
as 3:2007cv04171
Plaintiff:
James B. Porter
Defendant:
Bertelsmann AG, Random House Inc., Alfred A. Knopf and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hauenstein v. Frey
as 2:2006cv01030
Plaintiff:
Garrett Hauenstein, Garrett Hauenstein, Garrett Hauenstein and others
Defendant:
James Frey, Big Jim Industries Inc, Random House Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
