Cases 1 - 10 of 45
LUZUNARIS v. MORROGH
as 1:2022cv01698
Petitioner:
JOSE LUZUNARIS
Respondent:
RAYMOND F. MORROGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARRESTTOUILH v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2022cv01088
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND E ARRESTTOUILH and RAYMOND E. ARRESTTOUILH
Defendant:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARRIS v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01544
Defendant:
PETER MCNEILLY, JOE BIDEN, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01496
Defendant:
PETER MCNEILLY, JOE BIDEN, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADIN et al v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2020cv03104
Respondent:
JACKSON, HOLST, WILBURN and others
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ROSS, RAYMOND GAJEWSKI, SCOTT HOWIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AST v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv02202
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, M.D. CARVAJAL and LEXISNEXIS GROUP
Plaintiff:
JOHN RAYMOND AST
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AIGBEKAEN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01884
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, WILLIAM BARR and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND I. AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FURMAN v. ARTHUR et al
as 1:2020cv01442
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND FURMAN
Defendant:
ERROL ARTHUR and SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
AST v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv01172
Defendant:
M.D. CARVAJAL, LEXISNEXIS GROUP and WILLIAM BARR
Plaintiff:
JOHN RAYMOND AST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
