Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Alexander Stewart v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.
as 16-5261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alexander E. Stewart
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy
William Havens v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.
as 16-5016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Havens
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy; Chairman, Board for Corrections of Naval Records
Michael Crooks v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 15-5212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Crooks
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy and Dee Mewbourne, Rear ADM, USN, Naval Service Training Command
Walter Jackson, Jr. v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 14-5224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Walter J. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy and Chairman of the Board For Correction of Naval Records
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Havens v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.
as 12-5339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Havens
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy; Chairman, Board for Corrections of Naval Records
Jackson McGrady v. Dept. of Navy, et al
as 12-5195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jackson L. McGrady, Major, United States Marine Corps
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Navy and Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Becky Roberts v. USA, et al
as 12-5149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Becky Roberts
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy and Chairman of the Board For Correction of Naval Records
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
