Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Thompson v. Cockrell et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thompson
Defendant:
Joshua Cockrell and Robert Gerholdt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mascarenhas v. Thompson
as 4:2022cv01099
Petitioner:
Jelston Mascarenhas
Respondent:
Raymond Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strutton v. State of Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv06167
Plaintiff:
Albert Strutton
Defendant:
State of Missouri Department of Corrections, Richard Stepank, Jacqueline Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47843
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Thompson v. Jimminez et al
as 1:2021cv00165
Defendant:
Vasquez, Perez, Jimminez and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65696
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darius McCall v. Jeremy Jacobitz, et al
as 20-15724
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARIUS MCCALL
Defendant / Appellant:
COLTON HAFEN, JEREMY JACOBITZ, Officer Badge #9383, BRIANNA MUENZENMEYER and others
Defendant:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DROCK GAMING, LLC, DBA The D and RAYMOND THOMPSON
Thompson v. Hendrix
as 2:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Hendricks and Dwayne Hendrix
Plaintiff:
Michael Raymond Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael ThompsonIn re: Michael Thompson
as 19-5732
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL RAYMOND THOMPSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McCall v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv01319
Plaintiff:
Darius McCall
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Jeremy Jacobitz, Drock Gaming, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
