Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Timothy Hankins, Sr. v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 21-5156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
State of North Carolina, NC Administrative Officers of the Courts, North Carolina Court of Appeals and others
HANKINS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv01066
Defendant:
WAKE COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION SERVICE, NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS, WEST COUNTY DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRINGS et al. v. BRAITHWAITE et al.
as 1:2020cv03244
Defendant:
KENNETH J. BRAITHWAITE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SPRINGS and NATHANIEL REESE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Brud Rossman v. Miriam Sewell, et al
as 20-7064
Defendant / Appellee:
Metropolitan Police Department, John Doe N, William Lyke, Detective and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brad Rudolph Rossman
Markelle Seth v. DC, et al
as 19-7057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Markelle Seth
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, Andrew Reese, in his official capacity as Director of the D.C. Department of Disability Services and D.C. Department on Disability Services
EVERSON v. RIOT BLOCKCHAIN, INC.
as 1:2018cv01292
Plaintiff:
MARSHERI REESE EVERSON
Defendant:
RIOT BLOCKCHAIN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
GREENE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2016cv02115
Plaintiff:
LAUREN GREENE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, AMY DOSIK, PETER DOSIK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1738
REESE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
ERIKA P. REESE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 0409
REESE v. BAHASH
as 1:2007cv01530
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE A. REESE
Defendant:
ROBERT J. BAHASH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
