Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ospina v. Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01290
Plaintiff:
Luzangela Ospina
Defendant:
Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc. and D. Scott Carruthers Law
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Niles v. Cox, et al.
as 4:2010cv01004
Plaintiff:
Michael Niles
Defendant:
Donald A. Cox and Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Zagar v. Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00146
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zagar
Defendant:
Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc. and Donald A. Cox, Attorney at Law
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Garrett v. Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00566
Plaintiff:
Darlene R. Garrett
Defendant:
Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc. and D. Scott Carruthers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Niles, II v. Carruthers et al
as 4:2010cv00517
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Niles, II
Defendant:
D. Scott Carruthers and Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Herrle v. Carruthers et al
as 3:2010cv00092
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Herrle
Defendant:
D. Scott Carruthers and Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DeSimone v. Carruthers et al
as 2:2010cv00214
Plaintiff:
Jacquelynn DeSimone
Defendant:
D. Scott Carruthers and Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
