Cases 21 - 30 of 333
ASIM v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
HIBBA ASIM
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ANDREW SCHOFER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GHANDILI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
NAVID GHANDILI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, RAFIQ MANSOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ALFAISALI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
MOQBEL AHMED ALFAISALI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, JONATHAN POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PATEL v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
YOGESHKUMAR BALDEVBHAI PATEL
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, MIKE HANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
