Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Leibel v. Reubart, et al.
as 24-3395
Petitioner:
TATIANA LEIBEL
Respondent:
REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 2:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Shane Donavan Brooks
Defendant:
Roman, Chet Rigney, Tasheena Sandoval Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meas v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jerry Meals and Jerry Meas
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sashinger v. Logan et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Crystal Sashinger
Defendant:
c/o Logan, Warden Reubart, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cabalan v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cabalan
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sashinger v. Logan et al
as 2:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Crystal M Sashinger
Defendant:
Logan, Warden Reubart, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
Heather L. Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leibel v. Reubart, et al.
as 24-2212
Petitioner:
TATIANA LEIBEL
Respondent:
REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00586
Petitioner:
Heather Louise Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
