Cases 1 - 10 of 32
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Manuel Reynoso
as 8:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and the Toxic Substances Control Account, California Department of Toxic Substances Control and The Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Manuel Reynoso doing business as Orange County Metal Processing and Manuel Reynoso individually and doing business as Orange County Metal Processing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Rickey Alford v. P. Denny et al
as 2:2018cv04222
Plaintiff:
Rickey Alford
Defendant:
K. Cox, K. Cox, P. Denny and others
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Fernando David Reynoso
as 2:2018cv03763
Defendant:
Fernando David Reynoso and Fernando David Reynoso individually doing business as Cheos Tacos
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
John Gonzalez v. City of El Monte et al
as 2:2018cv02346
Defendant:
Michael Balzano, City of El Monte, Miriam Cuevas and others
Plaintiff:
John Gonzalez
Moises Reynoso v. Nascreen Akhter, et al
as 2:2018cv01837
Defendant:
Nascreen Akhter and Does
Plaintiff:
Moises Reynoso
Moises Reynoso v. Elijah M Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00903
Defendant:
Does and Elijah M Inc.
Plaintiff:
Moises Reynoso
Moises Reynoso v. International Meat and Produce Markets Corporation, et al
as 2:2017cv08238
Defendant:
Does and International Meat and Produce Market Corporation
Plaintiff:
Moises Reynoso
Moises Reynoso v. Vumm International, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv07770
Defendant:
Does and Vumm International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Moises Reynoso
In Re Return of Seized Property
as 3:2017cv02098
Defendant:
United States of America
Movant:
Manuel Reynoso-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983
Moises Reynoso v. Gregory Chronis et al
as 2:2017cv07447
Defendant:
Gregory Chronis and Does
Plaintiff:
Moises Reynoso
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
