Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Tikkun v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2005cv09901
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Tikkun
Defendant:
The City of New York , Michael Bloomberg , Raymond Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gatt Communications, Inc. v. PMC Associates, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Gatt Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
PMC Associates, L.L.C., PMC Associates, Inc., Phillip M. Casciano Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ross v. Blitzer et al
as 1:2009cv08666
Plaintiff:
Stuart R. Ross
Defendant:
David Blitzer , John Doe, Peter Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In the Matter of the Claim of Einer Jiminez v. County Of Nassau et al
as 1:2008mc00295
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of the Claim of Einer Jiminez
Defendant:
County Of Nassau, The Nassau County Correctional Ctr., Rashawn Beeks and others
Simon-Whelan v. The Andy Warhol Foundation For The Visual Arts, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv06423
Plaintiff:
Joe Simon-Whelan, Joe Simon-Whelan and Joe Simon-Whelan
Defendant:
The Andy Warhol Foundation For The Visual Arts, Inc., The Estate of Andy Warhol, Vincent Fremont and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Van Acker, Jr. v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al
as 8:2007cv00133
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Van Acker, Jr.
Defendant:
Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Office of Personnel Management Retirement and Insurance Group Office of Insurance Programs, Complaints Examining Unit Office of the Special Counsel, Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Schuh et al v. Druckman & Sinel, L.L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv00366
Plaintiff:
Christopher Schuh and Diane Schuh
Defendant:
Druckman & Sinel, L.L.P., Druckman & Sinel, L.L.P., Druckman & Sinel, L.L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
