Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Producciones Maritza Casiano Inc. et al v. Guerra-Seijas et al
as 3:2007cv02025
Plaintiff:
Producciones Maritza Casiano Inc. and Maritza Casiano-Cains
Defendant:
Juan Luis Guerra-Seijas, Amarilys German, Insurance Company A,B,C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America (Small Business Administration) v. Doe et al
as 3:2007cv01926
Plaintiff:
United States of America (Small Business Administration)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 631 Small Business Act
Puerto Rico Engineering and Distributors Co. (PREDCO) v. Chemineer, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01756
Plaintiff:
Puerto Rico Engineering and Distributors Co. (PREDCO)
Defendant:
Chemineer, Inc. and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Five Realty Investments, Inc. v. Safredd et al
as 3:2007cv01396
Plaintiff:
Five Realty Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Brian E. Safredd, John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Burgos-Bloom et al v. Municipality of Rio Grande et al
as 3:2007cv01360
Plaintiff:
Amilda Burgos-Bloom, Jeffrey Elliot-Bloom and Conjugal Partnership Elliot-Burgos
Defendant:
Municipality of Rio Grande, Mayor of Municipality of Rio Grande, Jose Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Gonzalez-Figueroa et al v. Mendez et al
as 3:2007cv01289
Plaintiff:
Hector Gonzalez-Figueroa, Manuela Rosa Gonzalez, Conjugal partnership Gonzalez-Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Angel Mendez, Julio Delgado, BFI of Ponce, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Integrand Assurance Company v. Pokras et al
as 3:2007cv01276
Plaintiff:
Integrand Assurance Company
Defendant:
Doris Pokras, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
