Cases 1 - 8 of 8
RICHARS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11985
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PATRICK RICHARS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOUGHERTY v. TOTSCH et al
as 2:2023cv14195
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
JOHN TOTSCH, RICHARD TOTSCH, TERRY RICHARS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DOUGHERTY v. TOTSCH et al
as 2:2023cv14193
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
JOHN TOTSCH, RICHARD TOTSCH, TERRY RICHARS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
RICHARS v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv00653
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RICHARS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chanel, Inc. v. The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 0:2021cv60308
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Franchise shoes and bags, Your Watches and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Caceres Cabezas et al v. Caceres Quispe et al
as 1:2009cv21995
Plaintiff:
Richar Caceres Cabezas, Richar Caceres Cabezas, Flora Quispe Apaza and others
Defendant:
Lloyd Aero Boliviano, S.A., Lloyd Aero Boliviano, S.A., Transporte Aero Militar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chinea et al v. The United Drywall Group,LLC et al
as 1:2009cv20274
Plaintiff:
Miguel Penate Chinea and Richar Calderin Remedios
Defendant:
The United Drywall Group,LLC, Frank A Sciullo, Jr. and Sam Sciullo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vallecilla-Velez v. United States of America
as 8:2008cv02406
Plaintiff:
Richar Vallecilla-Velez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
