Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Agma Security Service, Inc. v. US
as 21-1716
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: RANGER AMERICAN OF PUERTO RICO, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee: AGMA SECURITY SERVICE, INC.
Bell v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1678
Plaintiff / Appellant: JESUS GAMEZ, PHILIP JONES, FRANCISCO PEREZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Bell v. US
as 20-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD BENAVIDES, FRANCISCO PEREZ, MELITON CORDERO and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC V GLOBUS MEDICAL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1525
Defendant-Appellant: Globus Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellee: Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Company, Medtronic Sofamor Danek Deggendorf, gmbH, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and others
WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC V GLOBUS MEDICAL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1517
Defendant/Cross Appellant: Globus Medical, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant: Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Company, Medtronic Sofamor Danek Deggendorf, gmbH, Medtronic Sofamor Danke USA, Inc. and others
SB PHARMCO V MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL
as 08-1414
Defendant-Appellant: Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. and United Research Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellee: SB Pharmco Puerto Rico, Inc. (dba GlaxoSmithKline) and SmithKline Beecham Corporation (dba GlaxoSmithKline)
PUERTO RICO V US
as 01-5101
Plaintiff-Appellant: COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND HUMAN RESOURCES, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND HUMAN RESOURCES and COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND HUMAN RESOURCES
Defendant-Appellee: UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
NERY V US
as 00-1251
Plaintiff-Appellant: ABERLARDO LERGUNA, ABNER ALONSABE, ABRAHAM SOLOMON and others
Defendant-Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?