Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 827
Marin v. Lee, et al.
as 24-3186
Plaintiff: MEL M. MARIN, AKA: Mel Marinkovic
Defendant: ADRIENNE LEE, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and their Personal Capacities, KENDYL MAGNUSON, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and their Personal Capacities, STAR RIVERA-LACEY, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and their Personal Capacities and others
Duarte Rivera v. Garland
as 24-3027
Petitioner: EDUARDO DUARTE RIVERA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Delgado
as 24-2890
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MICHAEL RIVERA DELGADO
Frontier Dental Supply Inc. v. Gustavo Rivera Madrid et al
as 2:2024cv02131
Plaintiff: Dental Supply Inc. doing business as MVP Dental Supplies
Defendant: Gustavo Rivera Madrid and Marae Kay Onsgard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ramirez Rivera, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2587
Plaintiff: ELIA RAMIREZ RIVERA and ROBERTO CASIANO CHINO
Defendant: LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-2473
Petitioner: CELSO ALEXANDER RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff: GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant: RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
United States of America v. Rivera-Anaya
as 24-2040
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DANIEL RIVERA-ANAYA
Rivera Orellana, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1747
Petitioner: ANGEL MAURICIO RIVERA ORELLANA, HELEN YAMILETH CEBILLA DIAZ and MAURICIO ALEXANDER RIVERA CEBILLA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Franco-De Rivera, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1623
Petitioner: JENIFFER ALEJANDRA FRANCO-DE RIVERA and ANDRE RIVERA-FRANCO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?