Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Rivera v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv00678
Plaintiff:
Arcelie Pacolor Rivera
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A., MERS, Mortgage Electronic Registration System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Rivera v. Carpenter et al
as 1:2010cv00451
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rivera, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Carpenter, John or Jane Does 1-10,000, John or Jane Doe Corporations 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Rivera v. Carpenter et al
as 1:2010cv00402
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rivera, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Carpenter, John or Jane Does 1-10,000, John or Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Rivera v. Routh Crabtree Olsen et al
as 1:2010cv00202
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rivera, Jr
Defendant:
Routh Crabtree Olsen, Peter T. Stone, Derek Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kamai v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2009cv00496
Plaintiff:
Aryss D.K. Kamai
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Oahu Community Correctional Center, Unknown Utoalii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pagaduan vs. Revilla; et al.
as 1:2009cv00432
Plaintiff:
James Pagaduan
Defendant:
Irene Revilla, Vernon Tanaka, Laurence Lau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Apio v. Rivilla et al
as 1:2009cv00431
Plaintiff:
Steven J.K. Apio
Defendant:
Irene Rivilla, Vernon Tanaka, Laurence K Lau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Apio v. Rivilla et al
as 1:2009cv00424
Plaintiff:
Steven J.K. Apio
Defendant:
Irene Rivilla, Vernon Tanaka, Laurence Lau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pagaduan v. Revilla et al
as 1:2009cv00425
Plaintiff:
James Pagaduan
Defendant:
Irene Revilla, Vernon Tanaka, Laurence Lau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tia v. Sequeira et al
as 1:2008cv00575
Plaintiff:
Peter Ray Tia
Defendant:
Francis X. Sequeira, Theordora L. Leatumauga, J. Fujita and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
