Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Didericksen v. Earnshaw et al
as 2:2018cv00218
Petitioner:
Clara Didericksen
Respondent:
Dallas Earnshaw, Utah State Hospital and Bear River Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YL Wisdom v. Shelton et al
as 2:2017cv01135
Plaintiff:
YL Wisdom
Defendant:
Melissa Shelton and Crow River Animal Hospital
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Wasatch Transportation v. Forest River
as 2:2017cv00752
Plaintiff:
Wasatch Transportation
Defendant:
Forest River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Green River Companies v. AG Investment Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Green River Companies
Defendant:
AG Investment Corporation and Doug Wilde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James River Insurance v. All Resort Coach
as 2:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
James River Insurance
Defendant:
All Resort Coach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bear River Mutual Insurance Company v. Intermountain Claims et al
as 2:2016cv01034
Plaintiff:
Bear River Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Intermountain Claims and Tad Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Image Line et al
as 2:2016cv00845
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas
Defendant:
Image Line, Wind River Trucking and Rain Chief Resource Management
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Casey's General Stores et al v. Visa et al
as 2:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Casey's General Stores , Casey's Marketing Company , Casey's Retail Company and others
Defendant:
Visa, Visa USA Inc, Visa International Service and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Perez et al v. Fog River et al
as 2:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Fog River and John Bowen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
3 Rivers Logistics v. Diamond X-Press et al
as 2:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
3 Rivers Logistics
Defendant:
Diamond X-Press, Soma Transport, Harpreet K. Johal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
