Cases 1 - 10 of 14
KEITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16866
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KEITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11656
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROBERT KEITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MUNDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63076
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH MUNDY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv80320
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv43957
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv35885
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH BOWLIN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv95019
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUNDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67456
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH MUNDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24986
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH WILSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Claiborne v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00744
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Claiborne
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
